Money alone influences others. Please analyze and critically discuss. Money alone influences others. Please analyze and critically discuss
Respond to this Forum Discussion Prompter by FRIDAY midnight.Respond to two of your peer’s posts on the forum before SUNDAY midnight.
In the first class, we discussed our “working” definition of leadership as “Demonstrated ability to influence others toward a goal.” Today we learned about many early influencers. In the Roman Colony, leaders, or members of the court, were to be:
•Local elites•Be freeborn•Between the ages of 22 – 55•Community resident•Moral integrity
From the members, two were chosen as unpaid chief magistrates (Judges). They would have to “buy into” that position, but the recognition was worth the financial output. This week’s discussion prompter is:
Money alone influences others. Please analyze and critically discuss.
In your response, remember that all this is about leadership, the context which is set in Rome. If there is no “leadership” word in your post, or you do not talk about leadership in the Roman setting given above then you have missed what is required of you in this forum post.
Money alone influences others. Please analyze and critically discuss
